Monday, May 12, 2008

Coach D'Antoni

As you all are by now no doubt aware, the Knicks have hired Mike D'Antoni to be their new head coach.

A lot of the focus of the "pundits" has been related to whether or not the current personnel of the Knicks can play D'Antoni's up tempo offensive style.

The answer, of course, is no, not with the team as currently constructed.

The problem is that the question is all wrong.

If anyone really thought that the Knicks had all the right pieces and were really just one good coach away, then we're dealing with insane people who probably also think that deep down Dick Cheney really is a good guy who wants to be loved.

As it stands, though, the Knicks need to be completely and utterly overhauled, gutted, and built back up from scratch. The current team was put together by one of the most incompetent and misguided NBA executive of all time, a man whose name we would do well never to speak again, because I fear that even the sound of his name in the air can poison it with the stench of failure and misguided arrogance.

If you're going to strip a team down and build it back up again, then you would do well to bring in a coach that has a unique vision of exactly what he wants to do and exactly who the right people are to do it with. Mike D'Antoni is this indeed.

In addition, you'll want someone with experience and a record of success so that he can withstand a couple of rough years. Because make no mistake, and harbor no illusions: the next year or two isn't going to be necessarily pretty. Expect no magical one-year turnaround like the Celtics had this year, unless D'Antoni can bring Amare with him. Which he can't.

The point is, this isn't a hire intended for the short term. This is a hire to prepare for three years from now. If everything goes to plan, they'll be able to rid themselves of the bad contracts and useless players, adding draft picks and getting the rest of the team experience in the Seven Seconds Or Less system. Then they'll have the cap space necessary to get a big-name free agent that can put them over the top and in position to make a run at the Finals for the next four or five years after that.

That's the plan, anyway. And if Donnie Walsh is as smart as he seems to be, then the fans and the media will give them the leeway to make that plan happen. Which will include allowing for another mediocre and possibly playoff-less year next year.

We should also keep in mind that they are obviously not going to be keeping these same 12 guys next year. I'm as curious as anyone to see exactly what they do (can they trade Curry or Randolph? do they bring back Steph at all or pay him to stay away? etc.) Ultimately, though, a little patience is necessary.

So while I personally would have preferred Avery Johnson to have been the coach (mostly because I like rooting for him, for reasons I can't adequately explain) I am ultimately happy that we have someone like D'Antoni instead of a retread like Rick Carlisle or Scott Skiles or Sam Mitchell.

And the optimist inside me (I can't seem to kill it, no matter how much vodka and rib tips I ingest) imagines if maybe one day the Knicks can be as exciting and as fun to watch and root for as the Suns were the last four years. Wouldn't that be something? Isn't that what we've been dreaming of? Wouldn't that be the cure for what the last eight years has done to us Knicks fans?

At least with this hire, it is possible. And possibility is all you can ask for at this point.

4 comments:

THE INNOVATOR said...

Daniel,

I was working on a similar post. I understand the D'Antoni hire and think it is a good one. But like you I know this is going to be a rebuilding process because of all the bad players and contracts that the Knicks have.

However, I think there is manuverability because I believe there are other teams out there who will be retooling over the next few years. I am not advocating one specific player or another but the fact remains that teams like Milwaukee, Phoenix, Dallas and New Jersey all look as if major changes in their rosters are going to be made in the next few seasons.

On those teams you have guys like Mo Williams, Michael Redd, Charlie Villanueva, Andrew Bogut, Devin Harris, Richard Jefferson, Boris Diaw, Leandro Barbosa, Dirk Nowitzki, Jason Terry and Josh Howard. Again I am not advocating any specific player in that group, but they are all guys who have some game in this league and may be looking to be moved as those teams retool(and yes Dan I already know you think some of the players on that list are terrible so you dont have to point them out).

The one reason I really like the D'Antoni hire is selfish because I believe it may allow a guy like Renaldo Balkman to flourish. One would think Balkmans athleticism and speed would be right up D'Antoni's alley. Hopefully Rey realizes the opportunity in front of him and takes advantage of it over the next two seasons he is under contract.

There is a part of me that is disappointed that my man Action Jackson did't get the job. I would have just loved to see a city guy get a dream chance to run the team he grew up rooting for.

Dan Filowitz said...

You're right: it's not like they don't have ANYONE who can play that style.

In addition to Balkman, I also think David Lee, Nate Robinson, Wilson Chandler, and especially Jamal Crawford can thrive in a version of Seven Seconds or Less. That's five guys right there, six if you count Quentin Richardson, who did have his best year every under D'Antoni.

They still need a guy to run the point. Hopefully we'll get lucky in the lottery and get the #2 pick so we can draft Rose. If not, then maybe they can figure out a way to get Shaun Linvingston from the Clippers (worth a shot, despite his injuries, and probably get-able given the crap we have as 'trade assets'.)

So to your point, Kris, I do think that this team can be more respectable next year, if we catch some breaks in terms of players coming available. But I'd be okay just being better and looking promising, even if it didn't lead to a ton of wins right away.

Twinkie said...

As a conscientious observer, (I'm a roofer), aren't you a touch scared looking around the rest of the East with a touch of worry?

I mean, granted Boston has a 2-3 year window, but the top dogs don't seem to be going anywhere anytime soon.

I keep hearing that the Pistons can draft and Joe Dumars is a genius (although he did take Darko and the Thin Man was such an obvious pick). The Magic are really good and really young, someone in Cleveland will make sure LeBron doesn't go anywhere and Philly might actually get better now that they've shed Billy "I get credit for putting Aaron McKie and Eric Snow around the Answer for a Finals run" King.

Yes, the playoffs are a real possibility within two years and yes, everyone from area pundits to the Garden faithful except that it's gonna take a couple of years to get the smell of "He who can not be named" off this team...

But this leads into a post (Yes, I know. It's been a while) that I've been thinking about - the unrealistic expectations for all teams in the Northeast corner of the country.

If the Mets don't face the Yanks in the World Series, it's a bad year for each franchise and how much longer does Mangenius get before he's expected to dethrone the greatest dynasty in the current NFL?

Let's not forget that we all wanted to fire Coughlin less than a year ago and were ready to trade Elisha for a hot tottie, two cans of baked beans and a clean white T-shirt.

It's a different market, different than any other in the nation. Only Boston can compare (They were ready to fire Ainge before the trades and while the recent championship runs has cooled the crazy, just see how they turned on the C's after the Hawks pushed them to seven games...)

What's that all about?

zman said...

Twinkie asks a good question. I don't have an answer, but I have an observation.

A friend from college grew up in Nyack and married a woman from southern Florida. He went to Georgia for grad school, and they went to lots of Braves games because he likes live baseball. His wife grew to enjoy live baseball too. Then they moved to Boston, and they still went to lots of baseball games, but his wife didn't enjoy it. In Georgia they had "happy baseball" while in Boston they had "grumpy baseball."

I think northerners take sports too seriously, a large chunk of who you are as a person is tied up with your allegiance to the teams you root for. I think this is weird. Maybe it's the same in some southern areas - are Bama fans grumpy fans or happy fans? I don't know. But grumpy fans are weird.

Does Derek Jeter care about my opinion? Does Tom Brady care what Sully or Murph from Southie think? Probably not. They're too busy making millions of dollars and dating supermodels to care.

The older I get, the less I care about sports. I love watching sports live, and I still follow my teams, but I can't tell you who the goalie for the Columbus Blue Jackets is, or who the #3 receiver is in Cleveland.

Some people in the northeast are so caught up in being "real fans" or "good fans" or "diehard fans" that they turn into morons. I went to the AFC Championship game with a friend who was wearing a Swampscott Soccer sweatshirt and a grey ski jacket with yellow piping. Some drunk 24-year-old jackass got in his face for being a Charger fan. My friend was rooting for the Pats (he's from Swampscott for God's sake!), but dumbass thought his grey-and-yellow ski jacket was a Chargers jacket and practically challenged us to a fight.

So that's my observation. There are way too many jackass fans in the north who take fandom too seriously, who find meaning in the laundry of the home team even though the guys who wear the laundry don't care about them. Perhaps there are too few other cultural outlets, or perhaps northern culture is too tied up in being a loudmouth. I'll let you guys figure it out.